Aspetti della lingua e dell’ideologia senecana, Testi anche manuali a l’insegnamento universitario del romano 68, Bologna: Patron 2000

15 Mai Aspetti della lingua e dell’ideologia senecana, Testi anche manuali a l’insegnamento universitario del romano 68, Bologna: Patron 2000

Per. Setaioli, “Interpretazioni stoiche e epicuree in Servio addirittura la tradizione dell’esegesi filosofica del leggenda addirittura dei poeti per Roma (Cornuto, Seneca, Filodemo)”, I–II,International Journal of the Classical Tradition 10, 2003–2004, 335–376; 11, 2004–2005, 3–46.

A. Setaioli, “Le fragment II Soubiran duDe consulatu de Ciceron, leDe diuinatione et leur lecture par Virgile”, in:Signe et prediction dans l’Antiquite. Actes du Tete-a-tete international interdisciplinaire de Creteil et de Paris (22–23–24 no 2003). Textes reunis par Jose Kany-Turpin, Saint-Etienne: Publications de l’Universite de Saint-Etienne 2005, 241–261.

Anche. Merli, “Epigrammzyklen und ‘serielle Lekture‘ mediante den Buchern Martials: Uberlegungen und Beispiele,” mediante F

W. H. Stahl,Macrobius‘ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1952 (reprint: ibid. W. H. Stahl,Macrobius‘ Commentary on the Dream of Scipio, Records of Civilization, Sources and Studies 48, New York: Columbia University Press 1990).

P. Steinmetz, “Allegorische Deutung und allegorische Dichtung per der alten Stoa”,Rheinisches Museum fur Philologie N.F. 129, 1986, 18–30 (ristampato mediante: Pure, P. Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, e. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).

References

The ‘conferenceacta‘ comprise seven papers that are meant puro document the direction(s) durante which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) con the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published mediante the most recent registro of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).

Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up esatto the reader sicuro discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds‘ (and, of course, others‘) elite notion of ‘interpretation‘ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on verso par with its ‘traditional‘ sense, “puro expound the meaning of [something]; puro render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; preciso elucidate; to explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).

Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W prezzi interracialpeoplemeet.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made per wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning puro verso commentary on a collection of poetry.

For verso theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism sopra the age of the electronic mezzi di comunicazione,” in: G. W. Most (addirittura.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).

Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Addirittura. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), preciso name but a few.

W., at 283–284, gives verso list of the most important editions and commentaries, preciso which one might want esatto add Per. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis addirittura Soldatesco: il cadenza del analisi V, Libreria di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is per valuable supplement esatto P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and Per. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late to be included mediante W.’s bibliography.

The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant onesto be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography per Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late onesto be included per W.’s bibliography 401–490.

For per useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (addirittura.),Toto notus con orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.